Exploring the potential of shared modes among public transport users in Rio de Janeiro

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v33.e3126

Keywords:

Ridesourcing, Bike sharing, User perception, Service evaluation

Abstract

In this study, we examine how public transport users in Rio de Janeiro perceive ridesourcing and bike sharing services, focusing on how socioeconomic characteristics influence their use and users’ familiarity with these services. Among the 852 respondents, 91.8% reported using ridesourcing, while 90.5% did not use bike sharing. Through chi-square tests, we identified significant associations between ridesourcing use and gender, education, age, and car ownership. Bike sharing use was related to education, age, and household income. Many respondents reported being unable to evaluate bike sharing, indicating low familiarity. Ridesourcing received higher satisfaction ratings, whereas bike sharing still faces challenges. Our findings highlight the importance of integrated policies that consider users’ perceptions and needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acheampong, R.A.; A. Siiba; D.K. Okyere et al. (2020) Mobility-on-demand: an empirical study of internet-based ride-hailing adoption factors, travel characteristics and mode substitution effects. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, v. 115, p. 102638. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102638

Barboza, M.H.; M.S. Carneiro; C. Falavigna et al. (2021) Balancing time: using a new accessibility measure in Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 90, p. 102924. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102924

Boisjoly, G.; B. Serra; G.T. Oliveira et al. (2020) Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 82, p. 102551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102551

Callil, V.; D. Costanzo e J. Shiraishi (2024) Bike-sharing e desigualdades: os casos de São Paulo e do Rio de Janeiro. Cadernos Metrópole, v. 26, n. 60, p. 685-706. DOI: 10.1590/2236-9996.2024-6013.e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2024-6013.e

Cardoso, M.; T. Santos; L.G.A. Tessarolo et al. (2023) Exploring the resilience of public transport trips in the face of urban violence from a gender perspective. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 24, p. 16960. DOI: 10.3390/su152416960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416960

Cerutti, P.S.; R.D. Martins; J. Macke et al. (2019) “Green, but not as green as that”: An analysis of a Brazilian bike-sharing system. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 217, p. 185-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.240

Costa Lima, R.C.; M.F. Siqueira; C.F.G. Loureiro et al. (2023) Caracterizando o uso integrado de bicicletas compartilhadas e ônibus em Fortaleza com big data de bilhetagem eletrônica. Transportes, v. 31, n. 2, e2814. DOI: 10.58922/transportes.v31i2.2814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v31i2.2814

De Chardon, C.M. (2019) The contradictions of bike-share benefits, purposes and outcomes. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, v. 121, p. 401-419. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.031

Duran, A.C.; E. Anaya-Boig; J.D. Shake et al. (2018) Bicycle-sharing system socio-spatial inequalities in Brazil. Journal of Transport & Health, v. 8, p. 262-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.011

Haddad, E.A.; R.S. Vieira; M.S. Jacob et al. (2019) A socioeconomic analysis of ride-hailing emergence and expansion in São Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, v. 1, p. 100016. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100016

IBGE (2023) Censo Demográfico 2022: Panorama. Disponível em: <https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rj/rio-de-janeiro/panorama> (acesso em 12/05/2025).

IBM (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.

Li, J. e X. Wang (2020) Multimodal evacuation after subway breakdown: a modeling framework and mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, v. 6, p. 100177. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100177

Litman, T. (2002) Evaluating transportation equity. World Transport Policy and Practice, v. 8, n. 2, p. 50-65.

Lo, D.; C. Mintrom; K. Robinson et al. (2020) Shared micromobility: the influence of regulation on travel mode choice. New Zealand Geographer, v. 76, n. 2, p. 135-146. DOI: 10.1111/nzg.12262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12262

Mausbach, A.G.; D. Quinlan; S. Johnson et al. (2019) How to share what we used to own. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies. New York: IEEE, p. 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EVER.2019.8813565

Montes, A.; N. Geržinic; W. Veeneman et al. (2023) Shared micromobility and public transport integration: a mode choice study using stated preference data. Research in Transportation Economics, v. 99, p. 101302. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101302

Moscholidou, I. e K. Pangbourne (2020) A preliminary assessment of regulatory efforts to steer smart mobility in London and Seattle. Transport Policy, v. 98, p. 170-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.015

Nunnally, J.C. and I.H. Bernstein (1994) Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pritchard, J.P.; D. Tomasiello; M. Giannotti et al. (2019) An international comparison of equity in accessibility to jobs: London, São Paulo and the Randstad. Transport Findings, p. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32866/7412

R Core Team (2023) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Si, H.; J.G. Shi; G. Wu et al. (2019) Mapping the bike sharing research published from 2010 to 2018: a scientometric review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 213, p. 415-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.157

Teixeira, J.F. e M. Lopes (2020) The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: the case-study of New York’s Citi Bike. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, v. 6, p. 100166. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. PMid:34173457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166

Tembici (2020) Portal Bike Itaú - Tembici. Disponível em: <https://bikeitau.com.br/rio/> (acesso em 12/05/2025).

Tiznado-Aitken, I.; K. Lucas; J.C. Muñoz et al. (2020) Understanding accessibility through public transport users’ experiences: a mixed methods approach. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 88, p. 102857. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102857

Vecchio, G.; I. Tiznado-Aitken e R. Hurtubia (2020) Transport and equity in Latin America: a critical review of socially oriented accessibility assessments. Transport Reviews, v. 40, n. 3, p. 354-381. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2020.1711828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1711828

Venter, C.; A. Mahendra e D. Hidalgo (2019) From Mobility to Access for All: Expanding Urban Transportation Choices in the Global South. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute. Disponível em: <https://www.sipotra.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/From-Mobility-to-Access-for-All-Expanding-Urban-Transportation-Choices-in-the-Global-South.pdf> (acesso em 12/05/2025).

Warwar, L. e R.H.M. Pereira (2022) Tendências e Desigualdades da Mobilidade Urbana no Brasil II: Características e Padrões de Consumo da Mobilidade por Aplicativo. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA. DOI: 10.38116/TD2781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38116/TD2781

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Gagno Azolin, L., Rodrigues da Silva, A. N., Sant’Anna Cardoso, M. H. and Vieira da Silva, M. A. (2025) “Exploring the potential of shared modes among public transport users in Rio de Janeiro”, Transportes, 33, p. e3126. doi: 10.58922/transportes.v33.e3126.

Issue

Vol. 33 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Luiza Gagno Azolin, Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva, Marcus Hugo Sant’Anna Cardoso, Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:

  1. The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
  2. Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
  5. Authors confirm they have obtained all required employer permissions for the publication and CC BY 4.0 licensing of the manuscript, particularly if the employer holds any claim to the manuscript's copyright. Authors assume all responsibility for employer-related copyright issues, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any related liability.
  6. Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.

Last update: 11/27/2025