Probabilistic and sensitivity analysis in airfield pavement design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v34.e3259Keywords:
Cumulative damage factor; Airfield pavements; Structural analysis; Linear elastic design.Abstract
The structural performance of airfield pavements is influenced by variables related to the materials and the thicknesses of the layers, and understanding their effects is essential for safe and optimized projects. This study evaluates the performance of airfield pavements by combining probabilistic and sensitivity analysis. The probabilistic analysis was conducted using Rosenblueth’s point estimate method, quantifying the impact of variability in resilient moduli and layer thicknesses on the structural response. The sensitivity analysis identified the most critical parameters by calculating their relative influence on the vertical deformation at the top of the subgrade and on the cumulative damage factor (CDF). The results indicated that the subgrade resilient modulus has the greatest influence on pavement performance, followed by the thicknesses of the subbase, surface, and base layers. Reducing the variability of all input parameters increased the estimated service life from 13.1 to 19.0 years. This hierarchy highlights the importance of quality control, prioritizing subgrade characterization and uniformity, in addition to inspection during layer construction, offering technical support for the development of rational designs.
Downloads
References
Almeida, L. C., F. H. Cava, M. O. Serafim, & F. H. Oliveira (2025). Análise de confiabilidade em pavimentos aeroportuários utilizando o método de Rosenblueth. In Anais do 27º Encontro Nacional de Conservação Rodoviária e 50R Reunião Anual de Pavimentação (Belo Horizonte, MG), Belo Horizonte, pp. 1753–1761. ABDER; ABPv. DOI:10.21526/50rapv.157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21526/50rapv.157
ANAC (2021). Regulamento Brasileiro da Aviação Civil (RBAC) 154. Emenda nº 7. Projeto de Aeródromos. Brasília: Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil. URL: https://www.gov.br/anac/pt-br/assuntos/regulados/aeroportos-e-aerodromos/ cadastro-publico/normas-do-setor/rbac-154.
ANAC (2022). Manual de Cálculo de PCR de Pavimentos Aeroportuários. Brasília: Agência Nacional de Avi-ação Civil. URL: https://www.gov.br/anac/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/aeroportos-e-aerodromos/manuais-e-cartilhas/manual-de-calculo-de-pcr-de-pavimentos-aeroportuarios/view.
Barker, W. R. & W. Brabston (1975). Development of a structural design procedure for flexible airport pavements. Report FAA-RD-74-199, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
Brown, J. L. (1994). Reliability in pavement design? who’s kidding whom? Transportation Research Record 1449, 8–12. URL: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1449/1449-005.pdf [visited 06/04/2026].
Burmister, D. M. (1944). The theory of stress and displacements in layered systems and applications to the design of airport runways. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting - Highway Research Board 23, 126–148.
Castro, C. C. O. & F. H. L. Oliveira (2024). Effect of replacing resistance classification methods for flexible airport pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Part B, Pavements 150(3), 05024002. DOI:10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1314
Cava, F. H., D. B. Ribeiro, & C. A. Pereira (2026). Reliability of pavement design under seasonal variations: a case study of Brazilian airports. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 1–19. DOI:10.1080/14680629.2026.2698014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2026.2698014
Dalla Valle, P. & N. Thom (2015). Variability in pavement design. International Journal on Pavement Engineering & Asphalt Technology 16(2), 50–67. DOI:10.1515/ijpeat-2015-0009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijpeat-2015-0009
FAA (2021). Airport pavement design and evaluation. AC No 150/5320-6G, Federal Aviation Administration, Washing-ton, D.C. URL: https://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.current/ documentnumber/150_5320-6 [visited 06/04/2026].
Franco, F. (2000). Um sistema para análise mecanística de pavimentos asfálticos. MSc. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.
Garg, N., H. Kazmee, L. Ricalde, & T. Parsons (2018). Rutting evaluation of hot and warm mix asphalt concrete under high aircraft tire pressure and temperature at national airport pavement and materials research center. Transportation Research Record 2672(23), 117–127. DOI:10.1177/0361198118794293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118794293
Gujarati, D. N. & D. C. Porter (2009). Basic Econometrics (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Khazanovich, L. & Q. Wang (2007). MnLayer: High-performance layered elastic analysis program. Transportation Research Record 2037(1), 63–75. DOI:10.3141/2037-06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2037-06
McQueen, R. D., G. F. Hayhoe, E. Guo, J. Rice, & X. Lee (1995). A sensitivity study of layered elastic theory for airport pavement design. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Road and Airfield Pavement Technology, Singapore. Center for Transportation Research.
Mello, L. G. R., M. M. Farias, E. S. Preussler, & R. Preussler (2016). Análise do impacto do período de projeto de pavimentos no custo global de obras rodoviárias. Transportes 24(4), 64–74. DOI:10.14295/transportes.v24i4.1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v24i4.1056
Motta, L. M. G. (1991). Método de Dimensionamento de Pavimentos Flexíveis: Critério de Confiabilidade e Ensaios de Cargas Repetidas. PhD. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.
Noureldin, A., E. Sharaf, A. Arafah, & F. Al-Sugair (1994). Estimation of standard deviation of predicted performance of flexible pavements using AASHTO model. Transportation Research Record (1449), 46–56. URL: http://onlinepubs.trb. org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1449/1449-008.pdf [visited 06/04/2026].
Nowak, A. & K. Collins (2012). Reliability of Structures. Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI:10.1201/b12913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12913
Oliveira, F., L. Almeida, & S. Ramos (2016). Estudo do comportamento da aderência e do conforto ao rolamento em pistas de pouso e decolagem. Transportes 24(2), 27–33. DOI:10.14295/transportes.v24i2.1059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v24i2.1059
Parker, F., W. Barker, R. Gunkel, & E. C. Odom (1979). Development of a structural design procedure for rigid airport pavements. Technical report FAA-RD-77-81, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
PWGSC (1997). Manual of Pavement Structural Design ASG-19 (AK-68-12). Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Rosenblueth, E. (1975). Point estimates for probability moments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72(10), 3812–3814. DOI:10.1073/pnas.72.10.3812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.10.3812
STAC (2016). Séminaire du Lancement du Module Alizé Aéronautique de Dimensionnement des Chaussées Aéronautiques Souples: Présentation du Logiciel e Démonstration. France: Service Technique de l’Aviation Civile. URL: https://www.stac.aviation-civile.gouv.fr/fr/evenements/alize-aeronautique [visited 06/04/2026].
Thoft-Christensen, P. & M. J. Baker (2012). Structural Reliability Theory and its Applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Tighe, S., Z. He, & R. Haas (2001). Environmental deterioration model for flexible pavement design: an Ontario example. Transportation Research Record 1755(1), 81–89. DOI:10.3141/1755-09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1755-09
Timm, D. H., D. E. Newcomb, & T. V. Galambos (2000). Incorporation of reliability into mechanistic-empirical pavement design. Transportation Research Record 1730(1), 73–80. DOI:10.3141/1730-09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1730-09
Vieira, R. (2015). Dimensionamentos de pavimentos aeroportuários: a consideração de novas orientações. Msc.thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico. URL: https://scholar.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/records/mjIQjvKcIpw-lADs8OIZd3TRRxjFmdRsnNWZ.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lucas Cavalcante de Almeida, Mariana de Araújo Leite, Francisco Heber Lacerda de Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
- Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
- Authors confirm they have obtained all required employer permissions for the publication and CC BY 4.0 licensing of the manuscript, particularly if the employer holds any claim to the manuscript's copyright. Authors assume all responsibility for employer-related copyright issues, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any related liability.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
Last update: 11/27/2025
