Impact of layer thickness variations on pavement performance and life-cycle cost

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v34.e3226

Keywords:

Pavement performance; Layer thicknesses variability; Mechanistic-empirical design; Life-cycle cost analysis.

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of asphalt pavement layer thickness variations on structural performance and life-cycle costs. Factors such as materials quality, traffic load, and construction precision affect durability, with layer thickness deviations causing earlier failures and increased life cycle costs. This research combines pavement performance prediction and life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of pavements designed by the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) method and the Brazilian mechanistic-empirical (M-E) method. Eight scenarios, including designed and as-built structures, were analyzed based on field-extracted cores. The Monte Carlo method simulated thickness variability, assessing its effect on performance and costs over 120 months, focusing on cracking evolution. The results showed that M-E designs are initially more expensive but offer superior long-term cost-benefit by reducing maintenance. A 10% increase in layer thickness resulted in less maintenance and 63% cost reduction, highlighting economic advantage of better designs. The analysis can include other factors and other M-E methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AAPTP (2006). Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Airport Pavements. Auburn: Applied Research Associates Inc. Attoh-Okine, N. O. & W. M. Roddis (1994). Pavement thickness variability and its effect on determination of moduli and remaining life. Transportation Research Record (1449), 39–45.

Babashamsi, P., N. I. Yusoff, H. Ceylan, N. G. M. Nor, & H. S. Jenatabadi (2016). Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: review and analysis. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 9(4), 241–254. DOI:10.1016/j.ijprt. 2016.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.004

Burati Jr., J. L. (2006). Evaluating specification limits. Transportation Research Record 1946(1), 92–98. DOI:10.1177/ 0361198106194600111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106194600111

Cardoso, M. F., J. A. Oliveira, I. S. Bessa, L. F. Babadopulos, B. C. Gouveia, & J. B. Soares (2024). Strategies for life-cycle cost analysis based on mechanistic-empirical performance prediction for asphalt pavements designed by different approaches. In Proceedings of the 14th ISAP International Conference on Asphalt Pavement (Montreal), Cham. Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-67252-1_45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67252-1_45

Carneiro, R. S., J. B. Durán, & F. H. Oliveira (2023). Análise do custo do ciclo de vida na avaliação de estratégias de manutenção e reabilitação em pavimento aeroportuário. Transportes 31(1), e2740. DOI:10.58922/transportes.v31i1.2740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v31i1.2740

Dalla Valle, P. D. & N. Thom (2020). Pavement layer thickness variability evaluation and effect on performance life. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering 21(7), 930–938. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2018.1517873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1517873

Dinegdae, Y., A. Ahmed, & S. Erlingsson (2023). Toward a comprehensive pavement reliability analysis approach. Transporta-tion Research Record 2677(7), 680–692. DOI:10.1177/03611981231155179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231155179

DNIT (2018a). DNIT 134/2018-ME: Pavimentação: Solos: Determinação do Módulo de Resiliência: Método de Ensaio. Brasília: Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes.

DNIT (2018b). DNIT 135/2018-ME: Pavimentação Asfáltica – Misturas Asfálticas – Determinação do Módulo de Resiliência – Método de Ensaio. Brasília: Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes.

DNIT (2018c). DNIT 179/2018-IE: Pavimentação – Solos – Determinação da Deformação Permanente – Instrução de Ensaio. Brasília: Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes.

DNIT (2018d). DNIT 181/2018-ME: Pavimentação – Material Estabilizado Quimicamente – Determinação do Módulo de Resiliência – Método de Ensaio. Brasília: Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes.

DNIT (2018e). DNIT 183/2018-ME: Pavimentação Asfáltica – Ensaio de Fadiga por Compressão Diametral à Tensão Controlada – Método de Ensaio. Brasília: Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes.

DNIT (2021). DNIT 434/2021-ME: Pavimentação – Ensaio de Fadiga por Compressão Diametral à Tensão Controlada em Camadas Estabilizadas Quimicamente – Método de Ensaio. Brasília: Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes.

Dong, Q. & B. Huang (2012). Evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of asphalt pavement rehabilitations utilizing LTPP data. Journal of Transportation Engineering 138(6), 681–689. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000378

Feitosa, L. A. & F. H. Oliveira (2018). Análise econômica do custo de ciclo de vida para manutenção e reabilitação em rodovias: um estudo dos softwares e do catálogo de soluções CREMA-DNIT. In Anais do XXXII Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes (ANPET) (Gramado, RS), Rio de Janeiro. ANPET.

Franco, F. A. & L. M. Motta (2020). MeDiNa: Método de Dimensionamento Nacional. Manual de Utilização (Versão 1.1.4). Rio de Janeiro.

Guimarães, A. C. (2009). Um Método Mecanístico-Empírico para a Previsão da Deformação Permanente em Solos Tropicais Constituintes de Pavimentos. PhD. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.

Hughes, C. (1989). Compaction of asphalt pavement. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 152, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Jiang, Y., O. Selezneva, G. Mladenovic, S. Aref, & M. Darter (2003). Estimation of pavement layer thickness variability for reliability-based design. Transportation Research Record 1849(1), 156–165. DOI:10.3141/1849-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1849-17

Karnikowski, T. (2019). Seleção de estratégias de manutenção e reabilitação de pavimentos urbanos baseada na análise do custo do ciclo de vida. MSc. thesis, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Joinville.

Liu, L. (2015). Characterisation of variability in highway pavement materials and construction. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 16(9), 761–770. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2014.943219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.943219

Mandapaka, V., I. Basheer, K. Sahasi, P. Ullidtz, J. T. Harvey, & N. Sivaneswaran (2012). Mechanistic-empirical and life-cycle cost analysis for optimizing flexible pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. Journal of Transportation Engineering 138(5), 625–633. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000367

Mazumder, M., J. Yun, S. J. Lee, & K. D. Jeong (2021). Cost-effectiveness of conventional compaction (CC) and intelligent compaction (IC) methods of asphalt pavement overlay. Sustainability 13(21), 11830. DOI:10.3390/su132111830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111830

Mladenovic, G., Y. Jiang, O. Selezneva, S. Aref, & M. Darter (2003). Comparison of as-constructed and as-designed flexible pavement layer thicknesses. Transportation Research Record 1853(1), 165–176. DOI:10.3141/1853-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1853-19

Oliveira, J., M. Cardoso, S. Silva, I. Bessa, M. Farias, L. Babadopulos, B. Gouveia, & J. Soares (2024). Análise de custos de implantação e de manutenção de rodovias dimensionadas por métodos empírico e mecanístico-empírico. Transportes 32(2), 1–11. DOI:10.58922/transportes.v32i2.2936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v32i2.2936

Patel, A. & M. Thompson (1998). Consideration and characterization of pavement construction variability. Transportation Research Record 1632(1), 40–50. DOI:10.3141/1632-05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1632-05

Rajbongshi, P. (2014). Reliability based cost effective design of asphalt pavements considering fatigue and rutting. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 7(2), 153–158. DOI:10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014.7(2).153.

Réus, T. F. & H. B. Fontenele (2021). Effect of variations in layer thickness and resilience modulus on flexible pavement performance. Research, Society and Development 10(8), e42610817466. DOI:10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17466

Sakhaeifar, M. S., E. R. Brown, N. Tran, & J. Dean (2013). Evaluation of long-lasting perpetual asphalt pavement with life-cycle cost analysis. Transportation Research Record 2368(1), 3–11. DOI:10.3141/2368-01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2368-01

Sandoval, C. & A. Orobio (2013). Effect of construction tolerance on flexible pavement performance. Revista de Ingeniería de Construcción 28(3), 266–277. DOI:10.4067/S0718-50732013000300004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50732013000300004

Selezneva, O. I., Y. J. Jiang, & G. Mladenovic (2002). Evaluation and analysis of LTPP pavement layer thickness data. Publication FHWA-RD-03-041, Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology, Washington, D.C.

Sultan, S. A. & W. H. Joo (2000). Degree of compaction and its effects on cost and life of roads in Brunei Darussalam. In Proceedings of the 10th Road Engineering Association of Asia and Australasia (REAAA) Conference (Tokyo, Japan), Selangor. Road Engineering Association of Asia and Australasia.

Thomopoulos, N. T. (2017). Statistical Distributions: Applications and Parameter Estimates. Chicago: Springer. DOI:10.1007/ 978-3-319-65112-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65112-5

Toan, T. D., N. H. Long, Y. D. Wong, & T. Nguyen (2023). Effects of variability in thickness and elastic modulus on the reliability of flexible pavement structural performance. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 24(2), 2039923. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2022.2039923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2022.2039923

White, G. (2022). Difference between pavement thickness design and pavement life prediction for rigid aircraft pavements. Designs 6(1), 12. DOI:10.3390/designs6010012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6010012

Xu, Y. & Y.-C. Tsai (2012). Financial consequences of delaying pavement rehabilitation: case study using LTPP data. Journal of Transportation Engineering 138(8), 975–982. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000387

Zhang, M., H. Gong, R. Xiao, X. Jiang, Y. Ma, & B. Huang (2021). Life-cycle cost analysis of rehabilitation strategies for asphalt pavements based on probabilistic models. Road Materials and Pavement Design 24(1), 1–17. DOI:10.1080/14680629.2021. 2012235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2021.2012235

Downloads

Published

2026-10-28

How to Cite

Andrade de Oliveira, J., Sidney Bessa, I., Santos Ferreira, J. L., F. A. L. Babadopulos, L., Batista dos Santos Bastos, J., Chagas Silva Gouveia, B. and Barbosa Soares, J. (2026) “Impact of layer thickness variations on pavement performance and life-cycle cost”, Transportes, 34, p. e3226. doi: 10.58922/transportes.v34.e3226.

Issue

Vol. 34 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Jardel Andrade de Oliveira, Iuri Sidney Bessa, Jorge Luis Santos Ferreira, Lucas F. A. L. Babadopulos, Juceline Batista dos Santos Bastos, Beatriz Chagas Silva Gouveia, Jorge Barbosa Soares

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:

  1. The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
  2. Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
  5. Authors confirm they have obtained all required employer permissions for the publication and CC BY 4.0 licensing of the manuscript, particularly if the employer holds any claim to the manuscript's copyright. Authors assume all responsibility for employer-related copyright issues, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any related liability.
  6. Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.

Last update: 11/27/2025